Global

a quick survey of the fonts on my debian install reveals:

• Default 'sans serif', 'serif', and 'monospace' fonts: correct!
• DejaVu: mostly correct, although DejaVu Sans (non fallback) is a fail as it doesn't render any mark above the J.
• Hack, Liberation: fail, two marks on the J
• Nimbus: fail, two marks on the J, and it's trying to escape to the left
• Noto: mostly correct, although Cherokee, CJK, Coptic, Georgian, and Math variants fail by rendering two marks
• OpenSymbol: fail. renders the acute as if it were its own letter
• Quicksand, Symbola, URW Bookman and URW Gothic: fail, two marks on the J

all in all, a decent showing? from the default fonts especially.

and even this looks bad, not just 'cause it's times new roman (bwa) but also because the acute on the j is slightly higher than the one on the i

the only font on my system which seems to render it properly is times new roman:

'cause the j́ (j with an acute) isn't actually a proper char in unicode (it even renders incorrectly on this site lol), and it is very sometimes used!!

like very sometimes lol, you can place acutes on vowels to put emphasis on them or to distuingish them from homographs, but since <ij> is technically a vowel in dutch, you sometimes want to emphasise it, leading to íj́ lol

unicode doesn't support dutch properly.

my very scientific and accurate (/s) predictions suggest that green will surpass reform in opinion polling around august this year ^~^
(we can hope)

oh, thanks for the bug report!

i didn't realize digitigrade was missing notifications for one's own posts, i'll get right on adding that.

lmao why did ms teams give me a notification for a message i posted myself, on this device even!!!